The “thin edge of the wedge” strategy (Chris Dixon)

Establishing relationships with new users is the hardest part of growing a startup.  For consumer products establishing relationships can mean many things: installs, registrations, purchases, or even just getting users to think of your website as a place to go for certain purposes.  For B2B products, establishing relationships means getting internal users or testers and eventually contracts and payments. For business development partners – for example API/widget partners – establishing relationships usually means getting functionality embedded in partners’ products (e.g. a widget on their website).

One common strategy for establishing this initial relationship is what is sometimes known as the “thin edge of the wedge” strategy (aka the “tip of the spear” strategy).  This strategy is analogous to the bowling pin strategy: both are about attacking a smaller problem first and then expanding out.  The difference is that the wedge strategy is about product tactics while the bowling pin strategy is about marketing tactics.

Sometimes the wedge can be a simple feature that existing companies overlooked or saw as inconsequential. The ability to share photos on social networks was (strangely) missing from the default iPhone camera app (and sharing was missing from many third-party camera apps like Hipstimatic that have popular features like lo-fi camera filters), so Instagram and Picplz filled the void. Presumably, these startups are going to try to use mobile photo sharing as the wedge into larger products (perhaps full-fledged social networks?).

Sometimes the wedge is a “single player mode” – a famous example is early adopters who used Delicious to store browser bookmarks in the cloud and then only later – once the user base hit critical mass – used its social bookmarking features. Other times the wedge lies on one side of a two-sided market, in which case the wedge strategy could be thought of as a variant of the “ladies night” strategy. I’m told that OpenTable initially used the wedge strategy by providing restaurants with terminals that acted like simple, single-player CRM systems. Once they acquired a critical mass of restaurants in key cities (judiciously chosen using the bowling pin strategy), opentable.com had sufficient inventory to become useful as a one-stop shop for consumers.

Critics sometimes confuse wedge features with final products. For example, some argue that mobile photo sharing is “just a feature,” or that game mechanics on geo apps like Foursquare are just faddish “toys.” Some go so far as to argue that the tech startup world as a whole is going through a phase of just building “dinky” features and companies. Perhaps some startups have no plan and really are just building features, likely with the hope of flipping themselves to larger companies. Good startups, however, think about the whole wedge from the start. They build an initial user base with simple features and then quickly iterate to create products that are enduringly useful, thereby creating companies that have stand-alone, defensible value.

via cdixon.org

 

Posted by Chris McCoy
 

Photo tagging built Facebook, continues to be its most important feature

Every day, people add more than 100 million tags to photos on Facebook

Posted by Chris McCoy
 

LEARNING: In Facebook Vs. Google, Facebook Wins A Skirmish In Social Commerce (via Oliver Chiang at Forbes)

Image representing Eventbrite as depicted in C...

Image via CrunchBase

Facebook and Google have been engaged in a war for some time now over online engagement, user traffic and even employees, as the ever-growing social network expands into Google territory and vice versa. Now Facebook can add a small, but significant win: driving more traffic to online events registration site Eventbrite, and driving ticket sales.

Eventbrite, which allows people to set up pages to promote their events and sell tickets, just released a report titled Social Commerce that takes a look over the past 12 weeks at how social networks are driving traffic or ticket sales to the site. One finding: Facebook is the no. 1 referring site to Eventbrite.com, surpassing Google. One Facebook share of an event drives 11 visits back to the site, according to the report.

Just last April when I profiled the company, Eventbrite’s top referrer was Google, with Facebook in second. Those positions quickly changed. “The hyper-relevancy of the social graph breeds deeper engagement, greater sales and stickier audiences,” the report says.

It makes sense that more people would be interested in learning about an event from a share from their friend on Facebook rather than from a Google search. You see an event your friend is attending, maybe you want to go as well. Eventbrite says sharing rates are consistent across its events of all sizes, from a 10-person workshop to a 10,000-person conference.

Facebook is also a major driver of ticket sales, according to the report, which looked at each of the social networks it was on (Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn) and its own “email friends” sharing application. One share on Facebook represents $2.52 in sales transactions. A share through “email friends” equals $2.34; on LinkedIn, $0.90; and on Twitter, $0.43.

In aggregate across these social sharing mechanisms, each share equals $1.78. That’s during the 12-week study period. Eventbrite says the number continues to improve. The most recent 4-week average of the study period was $1.87.

“Social sharing magnifies word of mouth, and that act of sharing actually results in a real transaction at the end of the day,” says Tamara Mendelsohn, Eventbrite’s director of marketing.

The report comes on the heels of Eventbrite’s raising $20 million in fourth-round funding earlier this month, bringing total funding of the startup to $29.5 million. At the time, the company said it had brokered the sale of 7.5 million tickets this year and expected to sell more than $200 million worth of tickets by the end of 2010. That’s double the amount it sold last year. News site paidContent.org estimates the company is making well above $7.5 million in revenue a year now.

While Eventbrite isn’t a big player yet, it is a fast-growing company in online ticket sales. Its report is significant for event organizers and others in the industry, by giving actual hard figures to the transactional value of a share on social network.

Eventbrite co-founder Julia Hartz thinks the report’s findings apply to all of e-commerce, whether it’s discovering the value of a share on another good like a book. The company has already begun to act on the findings of its report. At the end of last month, it launched a new filter on the site’s events recommendation engine called Facebook Recommendations, which allows users to discover which friends are attending events.

Facebook is also a major driver of ticket sales, according to the report, which looked at each of the social networks it was on (Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn) and its own “email friends” sharing application. One share on Facebook represents $2.52 in sales transactions. A share through “email friends” equals $2.34; on LinkedIn, $0.90; and on Twitter, $0.43.
In aggregate across these social sharing mechanisms, each share equals $1.78. That’s during the 12-week study period. Eventbrite says the number continues to improve. The most recent 4-week average of the study period was $1.87.

Posted by Chris McCoy